Navigating Strike Off Company Notice and Compliance MCA Under Companies Act, 2013

Statutory Triggers and Grounds for Company Strike Off Under Section 248

The Registrar of Companies is empowered under Section 248(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, to initiate suo motu action to remove a company's name from the register. This typically occurs under specific statutory triggers: when a company has failed to commence its business within one year of its incorporation, or when it has not carried on any business or operation for the two immediately preceding financial years without making an application for obtaining dormant company status under Section 455.

Additional statutory triggers include scenarios where subscribers to the memorandum have failed to pay the subscription money within 180 days of incorporation, and a declaration to that effect has not been filed. Furthermore, under recent amendments, if physical verification conducted under Section 12(9) reveals that the company is not carrying on any business or operations, the ROC gains immediate justification to initiate strike-off proceedings, issuing notices via Form STK-1 to both the company and its directors.

Voluntary Strike Off Procedure and Filing Form STK-2

When promoters or directors decide to voluntarily shutter a defunct entity, they cannot simply abandon operations. The process demands strict adherence to Section 248(2), which mandates that a company may, after extinguishing all its liabilities, pass a special resolution or obtain the consent of members holding at least 75% of the total voting power.

The formal application must be submitted to the ROC via e-Form STK-2, accompanied by extensive documentation including an indemnity bond, a statement of accounts certified by a chartered accountant, an affidavit, and a copy of the special resolution. As premier Cost Management Accountants and compliance advisors, CMA Expert emphasizes that all pending statutory dues—including GST, income tax, and labor liabilities—must be completely settled prior to submitting STK-2 to avoid rejection and scrutiny.

Understanding ROC Notices: STK-1, STK-6, and STK-7

The strike-off lifecycle incorporates a series of structured public and private notices designed to safeguard stakeholder interests. Initially, the ROC issues Form STK-1 to the company and all its directors, providing a 30-day window to make representations if the company is indeed active. If no satisfactory response is received, the ROC publishes a public notice in Form STK-6 on the MCA portal, in a leading vernacular and English newspaper, and in the Official Gazette, inviting objections from creditors, workmen, or other stakeholders within 30 days.

Upon the expiration of the 30-day public notice period without any valid, legally sustainable objections, the ROC proceeds to issue Form STK-7. The publication of this notice in the Official Gazette officially marks the dissolution of the company, extinguishing its legal entity status from the date specified therein, barring liabilities that continue to attach to erstwhile directors under Section 251.

Prohibitions, Restrictions, and Fraudulent Strike-Offs

Not all companies are eligible for voluntary strike-off. Section 249 explicitly restricts certain classes of entities from applying under this route. These include listed companies, companies registered under Section 8 (non-profit organizations), companies whose application for amalgamation has been pending, and entities that have been subject to inspection, investigation, or prosecution under serious corporate fraud.

Moreover, Section 251 outlines severe penal consequences for fraudulent strike-off applications. If an application is made with the objective of evading liabilities, deceiving creditors, or dodging tax authorities, the promoters and directors face joint and several liability, criminal prosecution under fraud provisions, and recovery of heavy fines extending up to lakhs of rupees, alongside perpetual director disqualification.

Revival and Restoration of Struck-Off Companies via NCLT

If a company has been improperly struck off while holding active assets, ongoing litigation, or legitimate creditor claims, aggrieved stakeholders—including members, creditors, or workmen—can approach the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under Section 252 for revival and restoration of the company's name.

An appeal must be filed within specific limitation periods: 20 years for members and creditors if the company was operational at strike-off, or 3 years for the company itself if aggrieved by ROC action. Upon NCLT approval, certified copies of the order must be filed with the ROC via Form INC-28, whereupon the Registrar restores the company name, restoring status quo ante as if the name had never been struck off.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Statutory References & Regulatory Citations

• Ministry of Corporate Affairs - Companies Act, 2013
• Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs - Compliance Portal

Related Professional Advisory Services

• Company Registration
• Private Limited Company Registration Service
• LLP Registration Service
• Public Limited Company Registration Service